“The technology itself is not transformative. It’s the school, the pedagogy that is transformative.”
- Tanya Byron
Through this quote, I do not mean to undermine the power of technology, but it’s my firm belief that technology alone can’t take us to the summit of academic achievement. However, I am a firm believer in concept and skill-enhancing technology.
When I was in middle school in the 80’s in India, watching science videos on VHS was quite a luxury. I used to scramble for a front row seat. Also, I have used a magnifying lens to read vernier calipers, and I have replotted umpteen graphs on grid paper in my senior Physics class. It was frustrating at times, but I had no choice.
I have never imagined that twenty years later I will be flooded with countless gadgets and CD-ROMs piled up in my professional locker. Today, in my capacity as a high school Chemistry teacher, I take technology for granted. I begin my day plugging my laptop to a SMART Board, and I use Java applets to explain chemical equilibrium. A majority of my students use data loggers and probes with ease. They use LabQuests in place of magnifying lenses and Logger Pro (software for data collection and analysis) instead of grid paper. They collect and process data at the click of a mouse, and save it on their USBs to work in the convenience of their living rooms. I kind of 'envy' them.
As I mentioned earlier, technology should add value when used for classroom practice. It should catalyze the ‘aha’ moments in my science class. I want technology to be a game changer. I also want technology to encourage more boys and girls to opt for complex sciences in their junior and senior years. I want technology to bridge curricular gaps and accelerate skills in student communities. How do we reach there? Of course, there is no magic wand. I am an optimist, and I think technology could be one of the key ingredients of this achievement formula.
This is where Web 2.0, which is usually referred to the new breed of internet-based tools, can impact my student learning in a meaningful way. For example, I want my students to blog; so that I could gauge their conceptual understanding, and that would even allow me to reform my teaching strategies. I want to use ‘Edmodo’ (a social learning network) to keep my professional communication alive and up- to- date. I want to tweet to give a sense of pedagogical security and assurance to all my students. But this is not everything. Technology is more than social networks.
It’s not important how trendy a particular gadget is. Even video analysis using a digital camera could be of great help in my ninth grade Kinematics class. A TI calculator could be used in place of a broken data logger. My eighth graders could just watch a You- Tube video to figure out the mechanics of human transport. My senior Chemistry students could write an algorithm to describe the orbital shapes. In short, my technology oath lies in using a set of flexible tools consistently and coherently, so that my students could achieve the following goals in about a hundred and ninety working days:
-To deepen content understanding
-To enhance reasoning and problem-solving skills
-To improve presentation skills
-To promote environmental awareness
-To foster academic honesty and integrity